Peter A. Corning

BioSystems
Volume 266, August 2026, 105845

Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was seriously deficient. Although his concept of natural selection was an important contribution – highlighting the fundamental fact that life on Earth is a contingent, always at-risk enterprise – he failed to acknowledge the fact that all living systems – from the smallest single-celled bacteria to humankind – are also shaped by their evolved purposiveness (teleonomy). Their initiatives and activities – their “agency” – has exercised an important influence over the trajectory of life on Earth, as one of Darwin’s predecessors, Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck, appreciated. Lamarck proposed that changes in an animal’s “habits”, stimulated by environmental changes, have been a primary source of evolutionary change over time. Darwin also portrayed evolution as a fundamentally competitive process (the “struggle for existence” in Darwin’s term), as did many of his contemporaries. Today we know that life has also been a multi-faceted cooperative (synergistic) enterprise and that this has been of overriding importance in the evolution of complexity over time. Teleonomy and cooperative functional effects (synergy) have shaped natural selection in many different ways. Indeed, we now know that there have been many influences in evolution. My proposed Inclusive Synthesis is also open-ended, because it is expected that still more has yet to be learned about biological evolution; it is an ongoing work-in-progress rather than a completed theoretical edifice. “Teleonomic Selection” (after Corning) and “Synergistic Selection” (after John Maynard Smith) have played important parts in evolution. It’s time for a more inclusive theory.

Read the full article at: www.sciencedirect.com

Klaus Jaffe

Infodynamics explores how the interactions between information and energy generates useful work, offering a framework for understanding cognition. It views consciousness as an adaptive mechanism that enables an entity, biological or artificial, to construct an internal map of itself and integrate it into its environmental models (Weltanschauung). When these models incorporate the perceived internal states of others, empathy emerges. Empathy in turn allows to secure synergistic social cooperation to build robust new social structures. By focusing on the utility of information, infodynamics uncovers how consciousness and empathy serve as evolutionary tools to enhance survival odds and stabilize social structures. This approach provides an actionable methodology for detecting consciousness in living or artificial entities, that allows optimizing the design of advanced artificial intelligence, and of future educational systems. Both will drive cultural and eventually biological evolution.

Read the full article at: papers.ssrn.com

Karina Kofman, et al.

Organisms. Journal of Biological Sciences

Life is one of the most fascinating features of the physical world. Despite centuries of scientific study, experts still disagree about the definition, and even the possibility or utility of a definition, of this field. In a recent paper, we used AI to analyze the conceptual space formed by definitions of life given by a select set of modern workers in the life sciences and related fields. However, some of the most interesting material emerged as real-time conversations among those polled. In order to ensure that these ideas are not lost to the peer-reviewed scientific record, we here provide a minimally-edited (largely verbatim) transcript of the email chain among leading thinkers, containing numerous clarifications, disagreements, and challenges that enrich the topic of Life. It is our hope that this case study serves as an example for future papers, since the exchange of ideas among scientists is at least as interesting and valuable as formal scientific manuscripts written from a single perspective.

Read the full article at: rosa.uniroma1.it

Andrea Roli, Sauro Succi, Stuart A. Kauffman

Front. Phys., 08 July 2026

Current AI technologies have demonstrated impressive results, mainly driven by large language models (LLMs). The most diffused applications of LLMs are in the so-called generative AI, which consists in techniques that produce texts, music, pictures or videos–often in a multimodal setting. Challenging the intuition that machines cannot be truly creative, the artefacts produced by LLMs are sometimes considered as surprising, novel and creative. This view is also supported by observing that there are both theoretical and practical limitations on the predictability of AI systems’ outcomes. Actual creativity can also be transformative and inventive, hence not just unpredictable but unprestatable: true novelty arises within a process whose evolution of the very possibility space cannot be predicted. Prominent examples of unprestatability are the evolution of the biosphere and can be found in artistic human productions. In this contribution, we elaborate on the notions of predictability and prestatability in the context of current AI systems. We maintain that these systems are, to some extent, unpredictable but not unprestatable. A consequence of our contention is the definition of the limits of what AI systems can and cannot do, and therefore the contexts for which these technologies are best suited.

Read the full article at: www.frontiersin.org

Jasper J van Beers, Marten Scheffer, Prashant Solanki, Ingrid A van de Leemput, Egbert H van Nes, Coen C de Visser

PNAS 123 (27) e2608847123

From aircraft to power grids, controlled systems form a crucial part of human societies. Nonetheless, catastrophic failures happen. Many of those arise from the accumulation of incremental problems, such as natural wear and tear, that can go unnoticed until it is too late. We demonstrate that generic indicators of resilience can detect growing instabilities in damaged drones. The generic nature of our approach makes it compatible across diverse controlled systems. This not only allows for on-the-fly warning of instability but also facilitates anomaly detection during manufacturing and promotes proactive maintenance. A complementary application is to use our indicators for exploratory design, allowing one to “tinker” with systems through small adjustments and sensing quickly whether those worsen or improve system resilience.

Read the full article at: www.pnas.org